Restoration of vision after optic nerve lesions with noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation
Fedorov A, Jobke S, Bersnev V, Chibisova A, Chibisova Y, Gall C, Sabel BA.
Brain Stimulation. 2011;4(4):189‑201.
Clinical observational study investigating transorbital alternating current stimulation (tACS) in patients with optic nerve lesions.
Read on PubMed |
Journal page
Non‑invasive alternating current stimulation induces recovery from stroke
Fedorov A, Chibisova Y, Szymaszek A, Alexandrov M, Gall C, Sabel BA.
Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 2010;28(6):825‑833.
Study exploring neuroplasticity mechanisms and functional recovery after stroke using alternating current stimulation.
Read on PubMed |
PDF
Alternating Current Stimulation for Vision Restoration after Optic Nerve Damage
PLOS ONE. 2016;11(6):e0156134.
Multicenter randomized, sham‑controlled clinical trial evaluating transorbital alternating current stimulation for optic nerve damage.
Read full article
Impulse modulating therapeutic electrical stimulation increases visual field size in optic nerve lesions
Fedorov A, Chibisova AN, Tchibissova JM.
International Congress Series. 2005;1282:525‑529.
Early research describing impulse modulating therapeutic electrical stimulation (IMTES) and its potential to improve visual field size.
Read on Science Direct
Non‑invasive alternating current stimulation improves vision in optic nerve damage
Sabel BA, Fedorov A, Naue N, Borrmann A, Herrmann C, Gall C.
Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 2011;29(6):493‑505.
Study reporting functional vision improvements in patients with optic neuropathy after electrical stimulation therapy.
Read on PubMed
Noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation improves subjective visual functioning
Gall C, Sgorzaly S, Schmidt S, Brandt S, Fedorov A, Sabel BA.
Brain Stimulation. 2011;4(4):175‑188.
Research focusing on patient‑reported visual function and quality‑of‑life outcomes after electrical stimulation therapy.
Read on PubMed
Vision restoration after brain and retina damage: the residual vision activation theory
Sabel BA, Henrich‑Noack P, Fedorov A, Gall C.
Progress in Brain Research. 2011;192:199‑262.
Theoretical framework explaining mechanisms of residual visual activation and rehabilitation after retinal and brain damage.
Read on PubMed
Repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation in optic nerve damage
Gall C, Fedorov AB, Ernst L, Borrmann A, Sabel BA.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;27(4):335‑341.
Clinical investigation of repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) in optic nerve damage.
Citation reference
Neurophysiologic mechanisms of restoration process for patients with optic nerve damage
Chibisova AN, Bersnev VP, Fedorov A, Chibisova JM.
Kazan Neurologic Journal. 2008.
Article describing neurophysiological mechanisms of visual restoration following electrical stimulation.
View citation